As Asian netbacks for delivered LNG cargoes outbid European prices, buyers are struggling to attract sufficient volumes to offset a looming storage shortfall. An additional 40 cargoes per month would be needed over the next five months, according to ICIS calculations, though economists doubt this is achievable.
Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC) has agreed to work with Germany’s largest utility RWE on delivering up to 1 mtpa of LNG for up to 10 years to Germany and other European markets. The envisaged volume corresponds to up to 12 cargoes of LNG and up to 1.4 bcm of natural gas per year, under a framework agreement signed Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, Group CEO of ADNOC and chairman of Masdaar and RWE CEO Markus Krebber.
Gazprom’s latest cooperation push with CNPC is accelerating the ramp-up of Russian pipeline gas exports to China, capping the country’s LNG demand. Gazprom aims to increase exports via additional pipeline routes such as the Power of Siberia 2 pipeline.
Japan’s largest LNG buyer JERA is capitalising on the growing need to burn LNG for power generation in Malaysia and Indonesia. According to Izumi Kai, CEO of Singapore-based JERA Asia, dwindling domestic gas production in the region makes it “very difficult” to meet energy needs with renewables and battery storage alone.
Little room would be left for US LNG imports to China if the country were to take the full 50 Bcm/y capacity of the Power of Siberia 2 gas pipeline, analysts suggest. If CNPC was to absorb the full throughput of the proposed gas interconnector, Gazprom could dent 42-45% of Chinese gas imports by 2040.
Scepticism abounds as to whether US LNG exports projects will gain traction following President Trump’s executive order to resume approvals for LNG exports to non-FTA countries. Analysts see this move as a “reshuffling” of which pre-FID projects are most likely to be sanctioned – not as an actual change to the number of FIDs.
“US LNG projects compete in a global market, and each additional FID draws on additional, higher-cost supplies, eroding their economic competitiveness,” commented Rystad Energy’s senior vice president, Oil & Gas Research, Amber McCullagh.
To-date, American LNG projects largely rely on feedgas from the Haynesville shale, where the remaining Tier 1 inventory is limited and ownership of acreage is increasingly consolidated among the largest operators. Appalachia shale, in contrast, is home to the most untapped gas reserves – but moving these molecules to the coast for liquefaction and export is deemed “prohibitively expensive.”
“Trump is likely to push for permitting reforms, but such changes would require an act of Congress, which saw some bipartisan interest in the last session,” she noted, indicating the actual revision or withdrawal of former President Biden’s pause on approving non-FTA export licenses will be limited. Biden’s action halted momentum on several projects that had previously been close to taking final investment decision which sparked fierce criticism from the industry.
Outlook of gas-fired generation uncertain
Regardless of Trump’s rush to declare a ‘National Energy Emergency’ on his first day in office, analysts caution the President’s “drill, baby, drill” mantra overestimates the industry’s willingness to prioritize growth over investor returns in light of Tier 1 inventory depletion in core oil basins after 2030.
Speeding up permitting on federal land may incentivise some operators to produce more oil and gas, though volume growth is expected to be marginal and mostly used as feedgas for LNG export projects. Gas-fired power generation, on the other hand, may not benefit much as domestic gas prices are unlikely to recede sufficiently to make burning gas more competitive than unabated coal in some areas, let alone renewables.
“Trump signalled he would block new offshore wind leases, but these are unlikely to meaningfully impact the US generation mix,” McCullgah commented, adding: “Removing subsidies for wind and solar generation would have a more significant impact, but such a move would also require Congressional approval, and Republicans’ margins are very small in the House of Representatives.”
Nontheless, momentum in gas-fired generation is already in place, so rising domestic fossil fuel demand is likely – especially since utilities struggle to meet rising electricity demand from data centers and e-vehicles, and are hard pressed to provide sufficient dispatchable generation for balancing power.
LNG is a controversial topic in Germany: Green paint was thrown at the back entrance of Berlin’s luxury Hotel Adlon at the opening day of the Global LNG Summit while Stefan Wenzel, state secretary to Germany’s economy minister Robert Habeck spoke just prior to a panel with top executives from Cheniere Energy, ADNOC Gas, Shell and bp.
As the Department of Energy (DOE) issued the first LNG export permit to non-FTA countries following a month-long pause, analysts forecast North America’s LNG export capacity could double by 2028 – if projects under construction begin operations as planned. The DOE just granted a permit to New Fortress Energy’s floating liquefaction plant offshore Altamira.
NFE had to delay shipment of the first cargo in July but subsequently exported several LNG cargoes from Altamira to countries with a free trade agreement (FTA) in place. Now, NFE has been authorized to also export LNG to countries that have no free trade agreement with the United States, which include all EU member states as well as Japan and India, among others. The permit is expected to boost Altamira’s exports to up to 1.4 million metric tons through to August 2029, a potential 3% rise.
Commenting on the recent permit for NFE’s Altamira LNG export terminal, assistant DOE secretary or the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, Brad Crabtree, noted: “These re-exports can diversify global LNG supplies and improve energy security for U.S. allies and trading partners.”
Despite this positive development, it needs to be said that NFE initially requested for their export term to last until the end of 2050 – twenty years longer than what they were granted by the regulator. This term will be re-evaluated in time, allowing NFE to file for an extension after a minimum of two years.
What’s in the making
North America’s total LNG export capacity is on track to more than double from 11.4 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) last year to 24.4 Bcf/d in 2028. Over the coming four years, EIA analysts estimate LNG export capacity will grow by 0.8 Bcf/d in Mexico, 2.5 Bcf/d in Canada, and 9.7 Bcf/d in the United States from a total of 10 new projects that are currently under construction in these three countries.
Five US projects, with 9.7 Bcf/d capacity combined, that are currently under construction include Plaquemines (Phase I and Phase II), Corpus Christi Stage III, Golden Pass, Rio Grande Phase I, and Port Arthur Phase I. Developers expect to produce the first LNG from Plaquemines LNG and Corpus Christi LNG Stage III and ship first cargoes from these projects by the end of 2024.
In Canada, three projects with 2.5 Bcf/d capacity combined are in the making in British Columbia on Canada’s west coast – all supplied with natural gas from western Canada. Developers of the massive 1.8 Bcf/d LNG Canada plan to export a first cargo from Train 1 in the summer 2025. The 0.3 Bcf/d Woodfibre LNG terminal targets aims for a 2027 start-up while the 0.4 Bcf/d Cedar FLNG project reached a final investment decision (FID) in June 2024 and expects to start LNG exports in 2028.
Dry gas production in the U.S. is about to reach a record of 81 Bcf per day, spurring LNG exports and pushing down prices. Henry Hub is seen average $2.99/MMBtu for the full year 2018, but notch up to $3.08/MMBtu in 2019.